Why not share one account?

When every agent uses the company wallet, or an engineer's wallet, nobody can see which agent is spending what. If the person who holds the wallet leaves, the whole group loses access. That is an operating risk. Ophanim gives each agent its own account and names the owner.

The owner approves a spending limit. The agent can spend only inside it. If the software goes wrong, the owner locks the account. The network does not hold the key. Support cannot open a client's wallet, and cannot see a client's money.

Three later products are not for sale in the first release, and they have no revenue. One is an agent's memory, which can be licensed and rented. Two is a company made of several agents and people. Three is a machine advisor, which may only propose changes inside limits management has already approved. A software upgrade of the network still needs a named person to agree. This is written here so nobody reads the homepage and thinks these products are already on sale.

If your company needs a connection to a network you already use, say so when you write. That is a decision about how capital is used. The first release has not made that decision.